United States v. Lyles
26 F. Cas. 1024, 4 Cranch 469
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided October 15, 1834·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
was of opinion that it is an indictable offence, and overruled the motion in arrest.
See Chit. Gen Prac. Append. ii„ that an attempt to commit a m’Sdemeanor created by statute, is itself a misdemeanor. Rex v. Butler, 6 Car. & P. 368.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lyles, 26 F. Cas. 1024, 4 Cranch 469 (circtddc 1834).
26 F. Cas. 1024 (United States v. Lyles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Finlayson v. Cabarrus Bank & Trust Co.
181 F. Supp. 838 (M.D. North Carolina, 1960)
Lane v. Dorney
108 S.E.2d 55 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Brown v. Hodges
65 S.E.2d 144 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Barber v. . Powell
22 S.E.2d 214 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Realty Purchase Corp. v. Fisher
216 N.C. 197 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
194 N.E. 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
State v. Schleifer
121 A. 805 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1923)
Mulligan v. People
68 Colo. 17 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1920)
United States v. Galleanni
245 F. 977 (D. Massachusetts, 1917)
State v. Whitman
114 N.W. 363 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
Reed v. Maley
74 S.W. 1079 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1903)
People v. . Bliven
19 N.E. 638 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Hill v. Erwin
44 Ala. 661 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1870)
Norris v. Doniphan
61 Ky. 385 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1863)