United States v. Luyties

Second Circuit

United States v. Luyties

130 F. 333, 64 C.C.A. 579, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 1904

DocketNo. 166

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 130 F. 333 (United States v. Luyties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Luyties, 130 F. 333, 64 C.C.A. 579, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166 (2d Cir. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The principal contention advanced in argument is disposed of in our opinion in U. S. v. Julius Wile Bros. & Co., 130 Fed. 331, handed down to-day. An additional point is made that the article in question was not produced in and exported from France.

[334]*334The absinthe was shipped from Basle, in Switzerland, by a through bill of lading via Antwerp to New York. The bill of lading is dated several days after the invoice, and the importer explained that Pontarlier, France, where the invoice is dated, was not a shipping point where the agents of the Red Star Dine accept freight, and therefore the goods had to be sent first to Basle, where through bill of lading could be obtained. The invoice was consulated at Dijon, and there is no evidence in the case to controvert the statement of the special deputy collector that “the goods were imported * * * from France.”

The decision of. the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The principal contention advanced in argument is disposed of in our opinion in U. S. v. Julius Wile Bros. & Co., 130 Fed. 331, handed down to-day. An additional point is made that the article in question was not produced in and exported from France.

[334]*334The absinthe was shipped from Basle, in Switzerland, by a through bill of lading via Antwerp to New York. The bill of lading is dated several days after the invoice, and the importer explained that Pontarlier, France, where the invoice is dated, was not a shipping point where the agents of the Red Star Dine accept freight, and therefore the goods had to be sent first to Basle, where through bill of lading could be obtained. The invoice was consulated at Dijon, and there is no evidence in the case to controvert the statement of the special deputy collector that “the goods were imported * * * from France.”

The decision of. the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 F. 333, 64 C.C.A. 579, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-luyties-ca2-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack