United States v. Luyties

130 F. 333, 64 C.C.A. 579, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 14, 1904·No. No. 166·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The principal contention advanced in argument is disposed of in our opinion in U. S. v. Julius Wile Bros. & Co., 130 Fed. 331, handed down to-day. An additional point is made that the article in question was not produced in and exported from France.

[334] The absinthe was shipped from Basle, in Switzerland, by a through bill of lading via Antwerp to New York. The bill of lading is dated several days after the invoice, and the importer explained that Pontarlier, France, where the invoice is dated, was not a shipping point where the agents of the Red Star Dine accept freight, and therefore the goods had to be sent first to Basle, where through bill of lading could be obtained. The invoice was consulated at Dijon, and there is no evidence in the case to controvert the statement of the special deputy collector that “the goods were imported * * * from France.”

The decision of. the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Luyties, 130 F. 333, 64 C.C.A. 579, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166 (2d Cir. 1904).

130 F. 333 (United States v. Luyties) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. United States
169 F. Supp. 268 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)
East Asiatic Co. v. United States
2 Cust. Ct. 474 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)
In re Pettingill & Co.
137 F. 143 (D. Massachusetts, 1905)