United States v. Lutz
This text of 139 F. App'x 882 (United States v. Lutz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
William Roy Lutz argues that the district court’s upward departure from the range set out in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines violated his Sixth Amendment rights. We remand the sentence to the district court for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See also United [883]*883States v. Moreno-Hernandez, No. 03-30387, 2005 WL 1560269 (9th Cir. July 5, 2005).
SENTENCE REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 F. App'x 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lutz-ca9-2005.