United States v. Luna

383 F. App'x 426
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2010·No. No. 09-11122·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jaime George Luna has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Luna has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Luna’s response discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Luna, 383 F. App'x 426 (5th Cir. 2010).

383 F. App'x 426 (United States v. Luna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Espinosa v. United States
178 L. Ed. 2d 394 (Supreme Court, 2010)