United States v. Luna
383 F. App'x 426
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2010·No. No. 09-11122·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The attorney appointed to represent Jaime George Luna has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Luna has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Luna’s response discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Luna, 383 F. App'x 426 (5th Cir. 2010).
383 F. App'x 426 (United States v. Luna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Espinosa v. United States
178 L. Ed. 2d 394 (Supreme Court, 2010)