United States v. Luis Terry Wong-Alvarez

784 F.2d 1530, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23434
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Luis Terry Wong-Alvarez. Read the opinion of the Court — 779 F.2d 583
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 25, 1986·No. 85-5448·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wong-Alvarez seeks to appeal from a district judge’s order affirming the order of the magistrate setting a pretrial detention bond. :We remanded to the district court because neither magistrate nor district court had stated in writing the reasons for requiring a bond with the type and amounts of surety that was set, as commanded by Rule 9 FRAP. 779 F.2d 583 (11th Cir.1985). On January 15, 1986 the magistrate entered an order setting out reasons. A magistrate is a “judicial officer” within the meaning of the Bail Reform Act. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3041 and 3156(a)(1). We have reviewed the reasons and find no error.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Luis Terry Wong-Alvarez, 784 F.2d 1530, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23434 (11th Cir. 1986).

784 F.2d 1530 (United States v. Luis Terry Wong-Alvarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Luis Terry Wong-Alvarez
779 F.2d 583 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)