United States v. Luis Cruz-Valles

357 F. App'x 160
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 11, 2009
Docket08-50292
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 357 F. App'x 160 (United States v. Luis Cruz-Valles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Luis Cruz-Valles, 357 F. App'x 160 (9th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The government appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing an indictment that charged Luis Enrique Cruz-Valles with being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see United States v. Gonzalez-Valerio, 342 F.3d 1051, 1053 (9th Cir.2003), and we vacate and remand.

The government contends that the judgment must be reversed in light of our intervening decisions in United States v. Marguet-Pillado, 560 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 435, 175 L.Ed.2d 298 (2009), and Martinez-Madera v. Holder, 559 F.3d 937 (9th Cir.2009). We agree.

We decline to address Cruz-Valles’ argument that Marguet-Pillado and Martinez-Madera should be overruled. See United States v. Lynch, 367 F.3d 1148, 1158 (9th Cir.2004) (per curiam).

We therefore vacate and remand for proceedings consistent with this disposition.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cruz-Valles v. United States
177 L. Ed. 2d 1112 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 F. App'x 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-luis-cruz-valles-ca9-2009.