United States v. Luis Cruz-Valles
This text of 357 F. App'x 160 (United States v. Luis Cruz-Valles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
The government appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing an indictment that charged Luis Enrique Cruz-Valles with being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see United States v. Gonzalez-Valerio, 342 F.3d 1051, 1053 (9th Cir.2003), and we vacate and remand.
The government contends that the judgment must be reversed in light of our intervening decisions in United States v. Marguet-Pillado, 560 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 435, 175 L.Ed.2d 298 (2009), and Martinez-Madera v. Holder, 559 F.3d 937 (9th Cir.2009). We agree.
We decline to address Cruz-Valles’ argument that Marguet-Pillado and Martinez-Madera should be overruled. See United States v. Lynch, 367 F.3d 1148, 1158 (9th Cir.2004) (per curiam).
We therefore vacate and remand for proceedings consistent with this disposition.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
357 F. App'x 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-luis-cruz-valles-ca9-2009.