United States v. Lugo-Ramirez

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided March 29, 1996·No. 95-2000·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion



March 29, 1996
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 95-2000

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
EX. REL. JONATHAN R. REES,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

YOLANDA LUGO-RAMIREZ, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Cyr and Lynch,
Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Johathan R. Rees on brief pro se. ________________

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. Appellant's argument that the district __________

court erred in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing which

it had scheduled on demand by appellant and which appellant

then refused to attend, is frivolous. After a careful

review, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for ________

substantially the reasons stated in its order of July 7,

1995. See Loc. R. 27.1. ___

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lugo-Ramirez, (1st Cir. 1996).

United States v. Lugo-Ramirez (United States v. Lugo-Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.