United States v. Lucky Mapuni

530 F. App'x 651
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 21, 2013
Docket12-10357
StatusUnpublished

This text of 530 F. App'x 651 (United States v. Lucky Mapuni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lucky Mapuni, 530 F. App'x 651 (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10357

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00923-LEK

v. MEMORANDUM* LUCKY DIAMOND MAPUNI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013**

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Lucky Diamond Mapuni appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 180-month sentence for conspiracy to

distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mapuni’s counsel has filed

a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. Mapuni has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering

brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Mapuni’s conviction.

We accordingly affirm Mapuni’s conviction.

Mapuni waived his right to appeal his sentence. Our independent review of

the record discloses no arguable issues as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). Moreover, we reject

Mapuni’s contention that the district court invalidated the appeal waiver during

sentencing. See United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 977 (9th Cir 1998).

We therefore dismiss Mapuni’s appeal as to his sentence. See Watson, 582 F.3d at

988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 12-10357

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Watson
582 F.3d 974 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 F. App'x 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lucky-mapuni-ca9-2013.