United States v. Lucky Mapuni
This text of 530 F. App'x 651 (United States v. Lucky Mapuni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 21 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10357
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00923-LEK
v. MEMORANDUM* LUCKY DIAMOND MAPUNI,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 18, 2013**
Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Lucky Diamond Mapuni appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 180-month sentence for conspiracy to
distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of
methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mapuni’s counsel has filed
a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
as counsel of record. Mapuni has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering
brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Mapuni’s conviction.
We accordingly affirm Mapuni’s conviction.
Mapuni waived his right to appeal his sentence. Our independent review of
the record discloses no arguable issues as to the validity of the waiver. See United
States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). Moreover, we reject
Mapuni’s contention that the district court invalidated the appeal waiver during
sentencing. See United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 977 (9th Cir 1998).
We therefore dismiss Mapuni’s appeal as to his sentence. See Watson, 582 F.3d at
988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
2 12-10357
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
530 F. App'x 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lucky-mapuni-ca9-2013.