United States v. Lucille Mitzy Bosco Rodgers, Individually and as Surviving Spouse of Philip S. Bosco, Joerene Ingram and Laurel A. Bates, Trustee v. City of Dallas Department of Housing & Urban Rehabilitation, United States of America, (Internal Revenue Service)

712 F.2d 990, 52 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6104, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24632
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 1983
Docket80-1020
StatusPublished

This text of 712 F.2d 990 (United States v. Lucille Mitzy Bosco Rodgers, Individually and as Surviving Spouse of Philip S. Bosco, Joerene Ingram and Laurel A. Bates, Trustee v. City of Dallas Department of Housing & Urban Rehabilitation, United States of America, (Internal Revenue Service)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lucille Mitzy Bosco Rodgers, Individually and as Surviving Spouse of Philip S. Bosco, Joerene Ingram and Laurel A. Bates, Trustee v. City of Dallas Department of Housing & Urban Rehabilitation, United States of America, (Internal Revenue Service), 712 F.2d 990, 52 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6104, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24632 (5th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

712 F.2d 990

83-2 USTC P 9572

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lucille Mitzy Bosco RODGERS, Individually and as surviving
spouse of Philip S. Bosco, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Joerene INGRAM and Laurel A. Bates, Trustee, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF DALLAS DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN REHABILITATION,
et al., Defendants,
United States of America, (Internal Revenue Service),
Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 79-3358, 80-1020 and 79-3888.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.*

Aug. 22, 1983.

Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., William S. Estabrook, Wynette J. Hewett, John F. Murr, Michael L. Paup, Chief, Appellate Section, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant in Nos. 79-3358 and 80-1020 and defendant-appellee in No. 79-3888.

Ray, Trotti, Hemphill, Meadows & Hahn, William David Elliott, J. Michael Wylie, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellees in Nos. 79-3358 and 80-1020.

L. Lynn Elliott, Charles A. Thompson, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants in No. 79-3888.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before CHARLES CLARK, TATE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On May 31, 1983, the United States Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 2132, 76 L.Ed.2d 236, reversed the decision of this Court in United States v. Rodgers, and vacated the decision in United States v. Ingram. The cases were remanded to this Court with direction that they be remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

IT IS ORDERED that the cases of United States v. Rodgers, 649 F.2d 1117, and Ingram v. United States, 649 F.2d 1128, are remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court dated May 31, 1983.

*

Former Fifth Circuit case, Section 9(1) of Public Law 96-452 October 14, 1980

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rodgers
461 U.S. 677 (Supreme Court, 1983)
United States v. Rodgers
712 F.2d 990 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 F.2d 990, 52 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6104, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lucille-mitzy-bosco-rodgers-individually-and-as-surviving-ca5-1983.