United States v. Lucas
This text of 325 F. App'x 618 (United States v. Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Gene Edward Lucas appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his [619]*619jury-trial conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Lucas contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to adequately consider the sentencing factors pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and placed too much weight on his criminal history. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error, and that the sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 999-1002 (9th Cir.2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 F. App'x 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lucas-ca9-2009.