United States v. Lozano-Oregon
This text of 163 F. App'x 596 (United States v. Lozano-Oregon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Lozano-Oregon appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 180-month sentence for distribution of methamphetamine and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)© and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Lozano-Oregon has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
Our examination of the brief and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 F. App'x 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lozano-oregon-ca9-2006.