United States v. Lozano
This text of United States v. Lozano (United States v. Lozano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 22-10913 Document: 00516753500 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/17/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10913 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ May 17, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Kristy Marie Lozano,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:22-CR-3-1 ______________________________
Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kristy Lazano has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lozano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10913 Document: 00516753500 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/17/2023
No. 22-10913
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Lozano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lozano-ca5-2023.