United States v. Lowell Jones

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lowell Jones

487 F.2d 214, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7021

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 1973

Docket73-1769

StatusPublished

This text of 487 F.2d 214 (United States v. Lowell Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Lowell Jones, 487 F.2d 214, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7021 (4th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the briefs ánd oral argument, we find no reversible error. We note that defendant was found guilty of simple bank robbery, but not sentenced on that verdict. Defendant was also found guilty of aggravated bank robbery and was sentenced on that verdict. Both offenses arose out of the same facts. Since defendant's conviction for simple bank robbery merged into his conviction for aggravated bank robbery, defendant shall be deemed to have been convicted solely of aggravated, bank robbery.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the briefs ánd oral argument, we find no reversible error. We note that defendant was found guilty of simple bank robbery, but not sentenced on that verdict. Defendant was also found guilty of aggravated bank robbery and was sentenced on that verdict. Both offenses arose out of the same facts. Since defendant's conviction for simple bank robbery merged into his conviction for aggravated bank robbery, defendant shall be deemed to have been convicted solely of aggravated, bank robbery.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 F.2d 214, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lowell-jones-ca4-1973.