United States v. Lowell Jones
487 F.2d 214, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7021
Opinion
Upon consideration of the briefs ánd oral argument, we find no reversible error. We note that defendant was found guilty of simple bank robbery, but not sentenced on that verdict. Defendant was also found guilty of aggravated bank robbery and was sentenced on that verdict. Both offenses arose out of the same facts. Since defendant's conviction for simple bank robbery merged into his conviction for aggravated bank robbery, defendant shall be deemed to have been convicted solely of aggravated, bank robbery.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lowell Jones, 487 F.2d 214, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7021 (4th Cir. 1973).
487 F.2d 214 (United States v. Lowell Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.