United States v. Love

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Love

135 F. App'x 261

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 13, 2005·No. No. 04-16067; D.C. Docket No. 04-00041-CR-5-MCR·Published

Opinion

PER curiam:.

Christopher N. Patterson, appointed counsel for Demetrius Lamar Love, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANT[262]*262ED, and Love’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER curiam:.

Christopher N. Patterson, appointed counsel for Demetrius Lamar Love, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANT[262]*262ED, and Love’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Love, 135 F. App'x 261 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

135 F. App'x 261 (United States v. Love) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related