United States v. Louis Oliverez

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Louis Oliverez

469 F.2d 337

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 3, 1972

Docket72-1783

StatusPublished

This text of 469 F.2d 337 (United States v. Louis Oliverez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Louis Oliverez, 469 F.2d 337 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was convicted, upon ample evidence, of smuggling marihuana into the United States from Mexico.

The only issue on appeal is the claim of error in the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment bel cause the grand jury proceedings had not been recorded. The point was explored and decided adversely to appellant in United States v. Thoresen (9th Cir. 1970) 428 F.2d 654, to which we adhere.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was convicted, upon ample evidence, of smuggling marihuana into the United States from Mexico.

The only issue on appeal is the claim of error in the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment bel cause the grand jury proceedings had not been recorded. The point was explored and decided adversely to appellant in United States v. Thoresen (9th Cir. 1970) 428 F.2d 654, to which we adhere.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

469 F.2d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-louis-oliverez-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack