United States v. Louis Oliverez

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Louis Oliverez

469 F.2d 337

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 3, 1972·No. 72-1783·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was convicted, upon ample evidence, of smuggling marihuana into the United States from Mexico.

The only issue on appeal is the claim of error in the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment bel cause the grand jury proceedings had not been recorded. The point was explored and decided adversely to appellant in United States v. Thoresen (9th Cir. 1970) 428 F.2d 654, to which we adhere.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was convicted, upon ample evidence, of smuggling marihuana into the United States from Mexico.

The only issue on appeal is the claim of error in the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment bel cause the grand jury proceedings had not been recorded. The point was explored and decided adversely to appellant in United States v. Thoresen (9th Cir. 1970) 428 F.2d 654, to which we adhere.

United States v. Louis Oliverez, 469 F.2d 337 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

469 F.2d 337 (United States v. Louis Oliverez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related