United States v. Louis M. Darensbourg

524 F.2d 233
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 4, 1975·No. 74-2313·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

GEE, Circuit Judge:

In his petition for rehearing, defendant-appellee points out a factual inaccuracy in the preamble to our opinion. The fourth sentence in the opinion is therefore corrected to read as follows:

A search by authority of the warrant produced weapons, though not precisely those named in the warrant, including a sawed-off shotgun (of smaller gauge than that stated) allegedly used in the armed robbery of a drive-in grocery.

In all other respects, the Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Louis M. Darensbourg, 524 F.2d 233 (5th Cir. 1975).

524 F.2d 233 (United States v. Louis M. Darensbourg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Zucco
537 F. Supp. 901 (W.D. New York, 1982)
United States v. Nilsen
482 F. Supp. 1335 (D. New Jersey, 1980)
United States v. Stephenson
490 F. Supp. 625 (E.D. Michigan, 1979)
United States v. La Monte
455 F. Supp. 952 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)
Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique
577 F.2d 1153 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Simmons
444 F. Supp. 500 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)
United States v. Richard L. Swihart
554 F.2d 264 (Sixth Circuit, 1977)