United States v. Louis Dan Smith

468 F.2d 651

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 The evidence was sufficient to warrant the conviction of appellant on an indictment charging the robbery of a bank. Title 18, U.S.C.A., § 2113(a), (d). There was no error in the charge on the inference of guilt which might be drawn by the jury from possession by appellant of some of the money taken from the bank. Wilson v. United States, 1896, 162 U.S. 613, 619-620, 16 S.Ct. 895, 40 L.Ed. 1090; Thurmond v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 377 F.2d 448, 451.

1 . See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.