United States v. Louis Dan Smith

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Louis Dan Smith

468 F.2d 651

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 21, 1973

Docket72-2180

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 468 F.2d 651 (United States v. Louis Dan Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Louis Dan Smith, 468 F.2d 651 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 The evidence was sufficient to warrant the conviction of appellant on an indictment charging the robbery of a bank. Title 18, U.S.C.A., § 2113(a), (d). There was no error in the charge on the inference of guilt which might be drawn by the jury from possession by appellant of some of the money taken from the bank. Wilson v. United States, 1896, 162 U.S. 613, 619-620, 16 S.Ct. 895, 40 L.Ed. 1090; Thurmond v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 377 F.2d 448, 451.

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 The evidence was sufficient to warrant the conviction of appellant on an indictment charging the robbery of a bank. Title 18, U.S.C.A., § 2113(a), (d). There was no error in the charge on the inference of guilt which might be drawn by the jury from possession by appellant of some of the money taken from the bank. Wilson v. United States, 1896, 162 U.S. 613, 619-620, 16 S.Ct. 895, 40 L.Ed. 1090; Thurmond v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 377 F.2d 448, 451.

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

468 F.2d 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-louis-dan-smith-ca5-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack