United States v. Lotus Petroleum, Inc.

678 F.2d 1082, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19825
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals·Decided April 26, 1982·No. No. 5-74·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In accordance with the authorities cited in our recent opinion decided April 9, 1982 in consolidated appeals Nos. 5-71 and 5-77, United States of America, et al. v. Andrus Energy Corporation, et al. and No. 5-72, United States of America v. Robison Energy, Inc., et al., 678 F.2d 1081, and for the reasons stated therein, we hold that Appellants’ challenge of the Department of Energy subpoena in question and the order enforcing it by United States District Judge Woodrow B. Seals, Southern District of Texas, is frivolous and entirely without merit; that the subpoena is valid and was properly enforced.

The order and judgment of the District Court appealed from should be and is hereby affirmed and this appeal dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lotus Petroleum, Inc., 678 F.2d 1082, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19825 (tecoa 1982).

678 F.2d 1082 (United States v. Lotus Petroleum, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Texas Energy Petroleum Corp.
719 F.2d 394 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1983)
United States v. Ferrell
717 F.2d 562 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1983)
United States v. Thriftyman, Inc.
704 F.2d 1240 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1983)
United States v. RFB Petroleum, Inc.
703 F.2d 528 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1983)
United States v. Ted True, Inc.
687 F.2d 491 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1982)
United States v. LaJet, Inc.
685 F.2d 1378 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Phoenix Petroleum Co.
571 F. Supp. 16 (S.D. Texas, 1982)