United States v. Lormond O. Wise
This text of 421 F.2d 1391 (United States v. Lormond O. Wise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment in this Dyer Act case is affirmed.
We have reviewed the evidence, the sufficiency of which is attacked. Counsel for appellant sincerely believes in his client’s innocence. But mathematical certainty is not required. The standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. If Wise is innocent, he still got himself into a very damning set of circumstances from which the required inferences could be drawn.
Other points raised, we also find without merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
421 F.2d 1391, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lormond-o-wise-ca9-1970.