United States v. Lormond O. Wise
421 F.2d 1391, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10940
Opinion
The judgment in this Dyer Act case is affirmed.
We have reviewed the evidence, the sufficiency of which is attacked. Counsel for appellant sincerely believes in his client’s innocence. But mathematical certainty is not required. The standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. If Wise is innocent, he still got himself into a very damning set of circumstances from which the required inferences could be drawn.
Other points raised, we also find without merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lormond O. Wise, 421 F.2d 1391, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10940 (9th Cir. 1970).
421 F.2d 1391 (United States v. Lormond O. Wise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.