United States v. Lorenzo Salgado

616 F. App'x 764
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2015·No. 15-10204·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lorenzo Salgado has moved *765 for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Salgado has not filed a response, has completed the confinement portion of his sentence, and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *765 the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lorenzo Salgado, 616 F. App'x 764 (5th Cir. 2015).

616 F. App'x 764 (United States v. Lorenzo Salgado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis
483 F.3d 381 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)