United States v. Lorenzo Dewitt Law
This text of 395 F.2d 771 (United States v. Lorenzo Dewitt Law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
395 F.2d 771
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Lorenzo DeWitt LAW, Appellant.
No. 11786.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued May 8, 1968.
Decided June 14, 1968.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville; Robert W. Hemphill, Judge.
Herman E. Cox, Creenville, S.C. (Court-appointed counsel) (McDonald & Cox, Greenville, S.C., on brief), for appellant.
William B. Long, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (Klyde Robinson, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We find no error in the trial and conviction of this defendant of offenses under the Dyer Act.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
395 F.2d 771, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lorenzo-dewitt-law-ca4-1968.