United States v. Loren M. Welsand
This text of 53 F.3d 335 (United States v. Loren M. Welsand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
53 F.3d 335
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Loren M. WELSAND, Appellant.
No. 94-3295
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Apr. 10, 1995
Filed: May 8, 1995
Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Loren M. Welsand appeals the district court's1 grant of a writ of garnishment pursuant to the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act (FDCPA), 28 U.S.C. Sec. 3001-308. After careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that an opinion on the issues raised by this case would have no precedential value and that the case ought to be summarily affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Accordingly, we affirm.
The Honorable Diana E. Murphy, then Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, now United States Circuit Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F.3d 335, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23343, 1995 WL 262371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-loren-m-welsand-ca8-1995.