United States v. Lopez-Topete

103 F. App'x 70
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2004·No. No. 03-3637·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Geraldo Lopez-Topete appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to one count of interstate travel in aid of unlawful activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3). In a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Lopez-Topete challenges the denial of a downward departure motion based on diminished mental capacity. This argument amounts to an attack on the district court’s discretionary refusal to depart downward, which in the circumstances of this case is unreviewable. See United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirez, 350 F.3d 731, 734 (8th Cir. 2003).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lopez-Topete, 103 F. App'x 70 (8th Cir. 2004).

103 F. App'x 70 (United States v. Lopez-Topete) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)