United States v. Lopez-Topete

103 F. App'x 70
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 26, 2004
DocketNo. 03-3637
StatusPublished

This text of 103 F. App'x 70 (United States v. Lopez-Topete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lopez-Topete, 103 F. App'x 70 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Geraldo Lopez-Topete appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to one count of interstate travel in aid of unlawful activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3). In a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Lopez-Topete challenges the denial of a downward departure motion based on diminished mental capacity. This argument amounts to an attack on the district court’s discretionary refusal to depart downward, which in the circumstances of this case is unreviewable. See United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirez, 350 F.3d 731, 734 (8th Cir. 2003).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 F. App'x 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lopez-topete-ca8-2004.