United States v. Lopez-Santoyo
This text of United States v. Lopez-Santoyo (United States v. Lopez-Santoyo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before GASTON, STEWART, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Alberto LOPEZ-SANTOYO Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 201900244
Decided: 25 February 2021
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Ray B. Slabbekorn
Sentence adjudged 21 May 2019 by a general court-martial convened at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for eighteen months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander W. Scott Stoebner, JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. United States v. McPhaul, NMCCA No. 202000195 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. However, we note that the Entry of Judgment does not accurately reflect the disposition of the charges. Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is entitled to have court-martial records that correctly reflect the content of his proceeding. United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998). In accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1111(c)(2), we modify the Entry of Judgment and direct that it be included in the record. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
2 UNITED STATES NMCCA NO. 201900244
v. ENTRY OF Alberto LOPEZ-SANTOYO JUDGMENT Sergeant (E-5) U.S. Marine Corps As Modified on Appeal Accused 25 February 2021
On 21 May 2019, the Accused was tried at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, by a general court-martial, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Military Judge Ray B. Slabbekorn presided.
FINDINGS
The following are the Accused’s pleas and the Court’s findings to all offenses the convening authority referred to trial:
Charge I: Violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification 1: Possession, receipt, and viewing of child pornography between on or about 19 May 2016 and on or about 30 November 2018. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification 2: Possession, receipt, and viewing of child pornography between on or about 8 June 2015 and on or about 24 July 2015. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Dismissed. United States v. Lopez-Santoyo, NMCCA No. 201900244 Modified Entry of Judgment
Specification 3: Possession, receipt, and viewing of child pornography between on or about 24 July 2015 and on or about 29 April 2017. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Dismissed.
Specification 4: Possession, receipt, and viewing of child pornography between on or about 19 May 2016 and on or about 23 July 2016. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Dismissed.
Specification 5: Possession, receipt, and viewing of child pornography between on or about 11 January 2018 and on or about 21 April 2018. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Dismissed.
Specification 6: Possession, receipt, and viewing of child pornography between on or about 11 May 2017 and on or about 30 November 2018. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Dismissed.
SENTENCE
On 21 May 2019, the military judge sentenced the Accused to the following (as modified, if at all, during any post-trial action): Reduction to E-1. Confinement for eighteen months. Forfeiture of all pay and allowances for eighteen months. A bad-conduct discharge. The Accused shall be credited with 117 days of confinement already served, to be deducted from the adjudged sentence to confinement.
2 United States v. Lopez-Santoyo, NMCCA No. 201900244 Modified Entry of Judgment
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Lopez-Santoyo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lopez-santoyo-nmcca-2021.