United States v. Lopez Martinez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 27, 2024
Docket23-40179
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Lopez Martinez (United States v. Lopez Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Lopez Martinez, (5th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

Case: 23-40179 Document: 73-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 23-40179 FILED Summary Calendar February 27, 2024 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Hector David Lopez Martinez,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-323-1 ______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Hector David Lopez Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez Martinez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-40179 Document: 73-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/27/2024

No. 23-40179

well as Lopez Martinez’s response, which we directed counsel to have translated into English. See United States v. Moreno-Torres, 768 F.3d 439, 441 n.2 (5th Cir. 2014). It is dispositive that the Government has declined to waive the untimeliness of the appeal. See United States v. Pesina-Rodriguez, 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016) (per curiam). Accordingly, without prejudice to a future 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion that Lopez Martinez may file, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Francisco Moreno-Torres
768 F.3d 439 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Manuel Pesina-Rodriguez
825 F.3d 787 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Lopez Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lopez-martinez-ca5-2024.