United States v. Lopez-Martinez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lopez-Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 F. App'x 922
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 30, 2001·No. 01-40121·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40121 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OMAR LOPEZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-406-1 -------------------- October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Omar

Lopez-Martinez (“Lopez”) has requested leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Lopez has not responded to the motion. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the appeal is DISMISSED.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lopez-Martinez, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Lopez-Martinez (United States v. Lopez-Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)