United States v. Lopez-Llerena
This text of 721 F.2d 311 (United States v. Lopez-Llerena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
721 F.2d 311
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alberto LOPEZ-LLERENA, Felix Parra, Jose Borges, Jose Delfin
Mule Vasquez, Lazaro Cruz, Jr., Hector Theodore Valdes,
Fausto Manuel Sanchez, Raul Pinera, Carlos Oliver-Chirino,
and Jose Luis Marino, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 82-5916.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 30, 1983.
Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross, P.A., William R. Tunkey, Geoffrey C. Fleck, Miami, Fla., for Lopez-Llerena, Parra, and Borges.
Bruce H. Fleisher, Coral Gables, Fla., for Curuz, Valdes, Sanchez, Pinera and Chirino.
Mark King Leban, Miami, Fla., for Marino.
Stanley Marcus, U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Lurana Snow, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Before FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and ATKINS*, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
AFFIRMED; Circuit Rule 25. See United States v. Blasco, 702 F.2d 1315 (11th Cir.1983).
Honorable C. Clyde Atkins, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 F.2d 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lopez-llerena-ca11-1983.