United States v. Lopez-Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 20, 2001·No. 01-40200·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40200 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAUL LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-CR-90-1 -------------------- September 20, 2001 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Saul

Lopez-Hernandez (“Lopez”) has requested leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Lopez has not responded to the motion. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lopez-Hernandez, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Lopez-Hernandez (United States v. Lopez-Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)