United States v. Lopez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 F.4th 325
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2024·No. 23-50475·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-50475 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/03/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 23-50475 FILED April 3, 2024 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Bryan Emilio Lopez,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:22-CR-288-1 ______________________________

Before Willett, Duncan, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Bryan Emilio Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-50475 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/03/2024

No. 23-50475

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lopez, (5th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Lopez (United States v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)