United States v. Lopez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 8, 1999·No. 98-11059·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11059 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS CRUZ LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-258-8-T - - - - - - - - - -

June 2, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Carlos Cruz Lopez appeals his conviction and sentence after

being convicted by a jury of conspiracy to import and to possess

with intent to distribute marijuana. Lopez argues that the

evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for conspiracy.

He contends that there was no evidence that he knew of the

conspiracy or knowingly associated himself with the conspiracy.

The record was not devoid of evidence that Lopez knew he was

transporting marijuana or that Lopez voluntarily participated in

1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. the conspiracy. United States v. Inocencio, 40 F.3d 716, 724 (5th

Cir. 1994).

Lopez argues that the cumulative effect of the prosecutor’s

numerous instances of misconduct warrants reversal of his

conviction. Because this issue has been raised for the first time

on appeal, it is reviewed for plain error. United States v.

Tomblin, 46 F.3d 1369, 1386 (5th Cir. 1994)(plain error review of

prosecutorial misconduct). All except one of the alleged instances

of prosecutorial conduct are meritless when the prosecutor’s

argument is read in context. The argument about the prosecutor’s

appeal to passion and prejudice is not plain error. United States

v. Crooks, 83 F.3d 103, 107 (5th Cir. 1996).

Lopez argues that the district court erred at sentencing by

holding him responsible for drug amounts he had allegedly

trafficked on previous dates based on the unreliable testimony of

a coconspirator. The district court did not clearly err in finding

that Lopez was accountable for over 1,000 kilograms of marijuana.

United States v. Mergerson, 4 F.3d 337, 345 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lopez, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Lopez (United States v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U.S. v. Mergerson
4 F.3d 337 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Tomblin
46 F.3d 1369 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Gerald A. Crooks
83 F.3d 103 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)