United States v. Lopez
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6561
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SEVERO LOPEZ, JR., a/k/a Tono,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-150-P, CA-95-373-P)
Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996
Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Severo Lopez, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the rea-
soning of the district court. United States v. Lopez, Nos. CR-93- 150-P, CA-95-373-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lopez (United States v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.