United States v. Lonnie Vernon
This text of 485 F. App'x 892 (United States v. Lonnie Vernon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Lonnie G. Vernon and Karen L. Vernon appeal pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in the government’s action to reduce unpaid tax assessments to judgment and to foreclose on federal tax *893 liens on the Vernons’ property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Stead v. United States, 419 F.3d 944, 947 n. 3 (9th Cir.2005). We affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because the Vernons failed to establish a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the government’s assessments and all required notices were properly made. See Hansen v. United States, 7 F.3d 137, 138 (9th Cir.1993) (“Form 4340 is probative evidence in and of itself and, in the absence of contrary evidence, is sufficient to establish that notices and assessments were properly made.” (alteration, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, the district court properly concluded that the Vernons’ property could be sold to satisfy their tax debt. See 26 U.S.C. § 7403(a).
The Vernons’ contentions that the government lacks the authority to assess or collect taxes and their contentions concerning discovery are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 F. App'x 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lonnie-vernon-ca9-2012.