United States v. Lonnie Reynolds

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Lonnie Reynolds

726 F.2d 1536, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24623

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 12, 1984

Docket83-8533

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 726 F.2d 1536 (United States v. Lonnie Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Lonnie Reynolds, 726 F.2d 1536, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24623 (11th Cir. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case, writ of possession was executed by state officials in compliance with state law and due process. Pursuant thereto, the state officials properly were authorized to remove from an apartment personal property belonging to appellant Reynolds and place same on the public street. In the course thereof, the officials discovered, in the pocket of appellant’s sports jacket, several treasury checks later determined to be stolen. We find no error in the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress the checks. It was eminently reasonable for the state officials to conduct such an inventory-type search. See Illinois v. Lafayette, -U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. -2605, 2608, 77 L.Ed.2d 65 (1983) (“the inventory search constitutes a well-defined exception to the warrant requirement”); South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 96 S.Ct. 3092, 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976). The procedure followed here to remove weapons, drugs, or other items that might endanger the public from Reynolds’ personal property before placing it on the public street was reasonable. Cf. Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433, 447-48, 93 S.Ct. 2523, 2530-31, 37 L.Ed.2d 706 (1973) (“concern for the safety of the general public” justified search without warrant or probable cause of car towed by police to garage following accident and “vulnerable to intrusion by vandals”).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this case, writ of possession was executed by state officials in compliance with state law and due process. Pursuant thereto, the state officials properly were authorized to remove from an apartment personal property belonging to appellant Reynolds and place same on the public street. In the course thereof, the officials discovered, in the pocket of appellant’s sports jacket, several treasury checks later determined to be stolen. We find no error in the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress the checks. It was eminently reasonable for the state officials to conduct such an inventory-type search. See Illinois v. Lafayette, -U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. -2605, 2608, 77 L.Ed.2d 65 (1983) (“the inventory search constitutes a well-defined exception to the warrant requirement”); South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 96 S.Ct. 3092, 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976). The procedure followed here to remove weapons, drugs, or other items that might endanger the public from Reynolds’ personal property before placing it on the public street was reasonable. Cf. Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433, 447-48, 93 S.Ct. 2523, 2530-31, 37 L.Ed.2d 706 (1973) (“concern for the safety of the general public” justified search without warrant or probable cause of car towed by police to garage following accident and “vulnerable to intrusion by vandals”).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

726 F.2d 1536, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lonnie-reynolds-ca11-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack