United States v. Lonnie Poydras

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Lonnie Poydras

470 F. App'x 302

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2012·No. 11-30381·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

After studying the briefs and record, and hearing oral argument, it is clear that the district court erred in admitting the character evidence at issue, and that this error was harmful. We therefore REVERSE the defendant’s conviction and REMAND for a new trial consistent with this opinion.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

After studying the briefs and record, and hearing oral argument, it is clear that the district court erred in admitting the character evidence at issue, and that this error was harmful. We therefore REVERSE the defendant’s conviction and REMAND for a new trial consistent with this opinion.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Lonnie Poydras, 470 F. App'x 302 (5th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

470 F. App'x 302 (United States v. Lonnie Poydras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.