United States v. Longino Castillo

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: March 11, 2019
• Docket: 18-40060
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 18-40060 Document: 00514866861 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals

No. 18-40060 Fifth Circuit

FILED Conference Calendar March 11, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LONGINO CASTILLO, also known as Gino, also known as Gohard Bossman, also known as Diego Gohard,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:17-CR-340-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Longino Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castillo has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Castillo’s claims of ineffective

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-40060 Document: 00514866861 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2019

No. 18-40060

assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Castillo’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. All outstanding motions are DENIED.