United States v. Long

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Long

225 F. App'x 267

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Long. Read the opinion of the Court — 597 F.3d 720 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 18, 2007·No. 06-10470·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Shannon Ray Long has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Long has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Long’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Shannon Ray Long has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Long has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Long’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Long, 225 F. App'x 267 (5th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

225 F. App'x 267 (United States v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related