United States v. Long

232 F. App'x 332
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Long. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 F. App'x 260
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 10, 2007·No. Nos. 06-2264, 07-1133·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Jacob W. Long and Ronald Long appeal the district court’s order denying their motions to set aside default judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Long and United States v. $1197.00 U.S. Currency, No. 1:00-cv00164-WLO (M.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2006 & Sept. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Long, 232 F. App'x 332 (4th Cir. 2007).

232 F. App'x 332 (United States v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.