United States v. Long

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7454

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEITH ERIC LONG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-94-81, CA-97-81)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Eric Long, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Keith Long appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Long, No. CR-94-81; CA-97-81 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 11,

1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED