United States v. London

Fourth Circuit

United States v. London

261 F. App'x 449

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2006·No. 06-7614·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kitante London appeals a district court order denying his motion to reopen sentencing. We have reviewed the district court’s order and the record and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. London, No. 3:03-cr-000645 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 29, 2006); entered Aug. 30, 2006. We grant London’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kitante London appeals a district court order denying his motion to reopen sentencing. We have reviewed the district court’s order and the record and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. London, No. 3:03-cr-000645 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 29, 2006); entered Aug. 30, 2006. We grant London’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. London, 261 F. App'x 449 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

261 F. App'x 449 (United States v. London) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.