United States v. Locklear
This text of 590 F. App'x 258 (United States v. Locklear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Luther Locklear appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court properly dismissed the motion as untimely. Locklear’s claims on appeal are squarely foreclosed by our recent decision in Whiteside v. United States, 775 F.3d 180, 2014 WL 7245453 (4th Cir. Dec. 19, 2014) (en banc), and we therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. United States v. Locklear, Nos. 7:09-cr-00033-FL-2; 7:12-cv-00074-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
590 F. App'x 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-locklear-ca4-2015.