United States v. Lo Van
This text of 16 F. App'x 526 (United States v. Lo Van) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Chim Lo Van appeals the 100-month sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Lo Van argues his sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).
Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not err in sentencing Lo Van, as his sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum prison term for possessing with intent to distribute an unspecified amount of methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C); United States v. Aguayo-Delgado, 220 F.3d 926, 933 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 600, 148 L.Ed.2d 513 (2000).
Accordingly, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F. App'x 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lo-van-ca8-2001.