United States v. Llamas-Rodas
This text of 10 F. App'x 568 (United States v. Llamas-Rodas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM2
Sergio Llamas-Rodas appeals the sentence imposed following- his guilty plea to one count of illegal entry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Citing the principles announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Llamas-Rodas contends that he was deprived of his due process right to notice of the crime to which he was charged when the district court imposed a sentence based on a prior felony conviction that was neither pled in the indictment nor admitted during the plea hearing. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 1503, — L.Ed.2d — (2001).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 F. App'x 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-llamas-rodas-ca9-2001.