United States v. Little

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7188

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES TERRY LITTLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-94-49)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Terry Little, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Ap-

pellant's motion for production of transcripts at the Government's

expense. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Little, No. CR-94-49 (M.D.N.C. July 15, 1996). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED