United States v. Little

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7188

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES TERRY LITTLE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-94-49)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Terry Little, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Ap-

pellant's motion for production of transcripts at the Government's

expense. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Little, No. CR-94-49 (M.D.N.C. July 15, 1996). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED