United States v. Lirley
71 M.J. 187, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 328
This text of 71 M.J. 187 (United States v. Lirley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Lirley, 71 M.J. 187, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 328 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 201000502. Review granted on the following issue:
A SPECIFICATION STATES AN OFFENSE ONLY IF IT ALLEGES EITHER EXPRESSLY OR BY IMPLICATION, EVERY ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE. THE “TERMINAL ELEMENT” OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, IS AN ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE THAT MUST BE PROVED BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. SPECIFICATIONS 1, 2, AND 3 OF THE CHARGE DO NOT ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ. DO THE SPECIFICATIONS FAIL TO STATE AN OFFENSE?
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 187, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lirley-armfor-2012.