United States v. Linzy

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Linzy

283 F. App'x 995

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2008·No. No. 07-7611·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Duke William Linzy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider his sentence, construed as filed under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Linzy, No. 2:06-cr-00160 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Duke William Linzy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider his sentence, construed as filed under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Linzy, No. 2:06-cr-00160 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Linzy, 283 F. App'x 995 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

283 F. App'x 995 (United States v. Linzy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.