United States v. Linton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Linton

34 F. App'x 132

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 14, 2002·No. No. 01-7706·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Prince Linton appeals an order of the district court denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order of August 17, 2001, which denied his request for an inquiry into the procedure used to test drug evidence in his case and for independent retesting of the drug evidence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Linton, No. CR-97-22 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Prince Linton appeals an order of the district court denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order of August 17, 2001, which denied his request for an inquiry into the procedure used to test drug evidence in his case and for independent retesting of the drug evidence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Linton, No. CR-97-22 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Linton, 34 F. App'x 132 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

34 F. App'x 132 (United States v. Linton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.