United States v. Linley Vernon Tate, Sr.
This text of 862 F.2d 871 (United States v. Linley Vernon Tate, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
862 F.2d 871
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Linley Vernon TATE, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 88-7210.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 1988.
Decided: Nov. 10, 1988.
Linley Vernon Tate, Sr., appellant pro se.
Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr. (Office of the U.S. Attorney), for appellee.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Linley Vernon Tate, Sr. appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Tate, CR. No. 85-36; C/A No. 87-365-R (W.D.Va. June 28, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
862 F.2d 871, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-linley-vernon-tate-sr-ca4-1988.