United States v. Lindsey

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40644 Conference Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GENE O. LINDSEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CR-57(2) - - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Gene O. Lindsey has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 396 U.S. 738 (1967),

and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found

no nonfrivolous issue.** Accordingly, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. ** Lindsey filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to counsel’s Anders motion. This response was granted; however, Lindsey did not file a response. No. 95-40644 -2-

United States v. Jackson, 578 F.2d 1162, 1164 (5th Cir. 1978);

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.