United States v. Lightner

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lightner

30 F. App'x 329

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 25, 2002·No. 01-8050·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Fitzgerald Lightner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lightner, Nos. CR-93-133-P; CA-01-580-3-2-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Nov. 9, 2001, entered Nov. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David Fitzgerald Lightner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lightner, Nos. CR-93-133-P; CA-01-580-3-2-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Nov. 9, 2001, entered Nov. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Lightner, 30 F. App'x 329 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

30 F. App'x 329 (United States v. Lightner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related