United States v. Lidio Resendez-Guerrero

470 F. App'x 290
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2012·No. 11-50424·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Lidio Resendez-Guerrero (Resendez) appeals from his conviction for illegal reentry pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). His argument that his conviction must be vacated because neither the indictment nor the factual basis for his guilty plea mentioned that he had committed a prior aggravated felony is foreclosed and presents no legitimate basis for appeal. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007). We decline to consider his ineffective assistance of counsel claims because he did not raise them in the district court, the claims are premised upon evidence not contained in the record, and the record is not sufficiently developed for this court to consider the claims. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006); United States v. Navejar, 963 F.2d 732, 735 (5th Cir.1992).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lidio Resendez-Guerrero, 470 F. App'x 290 (5th Cir. 2012).

470 F. App'x 290 (United States v. Lidio Resendez-Guerrero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Cantwell
470 F.3d 1087 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Pineda-Arrellano
492 F.3d 624 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Benjamin D. Navejar, Jr.
963 F.2d 732 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)