United States v. Lidio Resendez-Guerrero
This text of 470 F. App'x 290 (United States v. Lidio Resendez-Guerrero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lidio Resendez-Guerrero (Resendez) appeals from his conviction for illegal reentry pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). His argument that his conviction must be vacated because neither the indictment nor the factual basis for his guilty plea mentioned that he had committed a prior aggravated felony is foreclosed and presents no legitimate basis for appeal. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007). We decline to consider his ineffective assistance of counsel claims because he did not raise them in the district court, the claims are premised upon evidence not contained in the record, and the record is not sufficiently developed for this court to consider the claims. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006); United States v. Navejar, 963 F.2d 732, 735 (5th Cir.1992).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 F. App'x 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lidio-resendez-guerrero-ca5-2012.